Senter response rejected!
This was not unexpected. As you probably know, paleontologist Phil Senter has been producing a number of anticreationist papers that are quite a bit more creative than the usual anticreationist drivel. In 2010, he published a paper critical of statistical baraminology in Journal of Evolutionary Biology , which I blogged about . Then I wrote a response, and to my shock JEB published it, which I also blogged about . Then Phil published a response to my response, which I blogged about thirteen months ago. That was the last time I mentioned this little exchange, since it took that long to do the largest statistical baraminology study ever in order to address what I felt were misconceptions about baraminology. If you'd like more detail on the content of that project, you can check out my abstract from this year's Origins conference (the last one in this PDF ). This time, though, the JEB editor was not so favorable, and he declined t...